The network-attached storage (NAS) market had a break-out years in the 2010s, with a a great deal of suppliers attempting to get a piece of the pie. Brand names such as EMC/ Lenovo and Thecus have actually fallen by the wayside, and even developed storage suppliers like Seagate chose to leave of the marketplace. QNAP and Synology have actually held company in the industrial off-the-shelf (COTS) NAS market indicated for home users, prosumers, SOHO, and SMB setups. ASUSTOR (backed by ASUS) has actually likewise been frequently launching NAS systems given that their very first item appeared in late 2012. TerraMaster launched their very first NAS around the very same time, however chose to focus more on the direct-attached storage section throughout the 2010s. The brand name has actually revealed restored interest in the NAS market over the last couple of years. Regardless of the cut-throat competitors in the COTS NAS market, some Asian suppliers are trying to get a toe-hold after developing themselves in allied markets. UGREEN, a customer electronic devices brand name understood for its power banks, battery chargers, USB adapters, and docks has actually likewise revealed its entry into the NAS market, however we will cover that in a different post.
Asustor, Buffalo, QNAP, Synology, TerraMaster, and Western Digital are presently the primary alternatives offered for users wanting to buy a COTS NAS for SOHO/ SMB usage. Out of these, Buffalo and WD upgrade their hardware alternatives just as soon as every 3 or 4 years. The others have a more routine cadence to their portfolio additions while continuing to preserve software application assistance for the tradition systems – in some cases even NAS systems launched as far as ten years back.
CES has actually generally been a great platform for NAS suppliers, enabling them to reveal their newest and biggest in both software and hardware, and sometimes reveal brand-new designs. Nevertheless, the attraction has actually been lost recently. It began with Synology and QNAP beginning their own conference intended towards partners/ resellers and designers. Ultimately, CES ended up being reasonably peaceful for this market section. Other service conferences concentrated on virtualization, security etc. are ending up being much better occasions for these NAS suppliers. In general, CES is no longer a crucial program for the NAS market. Having stated that, the rest of this piece catches a few of the statements made in the NAS area around the 2024 CES time-frame.
At the 2024 CES, UGREEN made a huge splash with the hardware alternatives for their approaching NASync series. Synology’s cubicle reworked systems that have actually been around for a huge part of 2023. A chuckle-worthy DS224+ (utilizing an ancient Intel Celeron J4125) was likewise on screen. ASUSTOR had a small existence in ASUS’s suite, and the other NAS suppliers provided the program a miss out on.
ASUSTOR Drivestor Lite and Drivestor 2/4 Pro Gen2: Arm NAS with btrfs Assistance
ASUSTOR has actually upgraded their lineup of Arm-based NAS systems for home/ individual usage, and the systems are currently offered for purchase. The brand-new Drivestor 2 Lite, 2 Pro Gen2, and 4 Pro Gen2 utilize a brand-new Realtek processor – the RTD1619B. This is a quad-core Cortex-A55 SoC with the CPU performing at 1.7 GHz. The Arm Mali-G51 MP3 in the SoC is clocked at 650 MHz. This lineup takes control of the Drivestor 2, 4, 2 Pro, and 4 Pro systems which had the Realtek RTD1296 (quad-core Cortex-A53 at 1.4 GHz). The increased processing power in the brand-new processor, paired with a brand-new SDK from Realtek, has actually now enabled ASUSTOR to bring btrfs assistance in this lineup.
Regardless of utilizing the very same SoC, the Lite design separates itself from the Pro design by selecting half the RAM, and limiting itself to a 1 GbE LAN port (compared to the 2.5 GbE in the Pro ones). 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports in the Pro designs are positioned by a USB 2.0 port in the Lite design. There are 2 drive bays, however the drives themselves are not hot-swappable. ASUSTOR is promoting the transcoding efficiency of the brand-new efficiency and depicting the Drivestor 2 Lite as a capable NAS for Plex and their own ‘LooksGood’ application.
.(* )The Pro Gen2 designs have hot-swappable bays. In addition to the hardware setup updates, ASUSTOR is promoting a various set of applications such as Portainer (Docker) compared to the Lite design. The distinctions in the requirements are highlighted in the table listed below.
.
. | |||
Drivestor 2 Lite |
Drivestor 2 Pro Gen2 |
Drivestor 4 Pro Gen2 |
. |
AS1102TL | AS3302T v2(* ) . | . | . |
. ( 4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz/ Arm Mali-G51 MP3) |
.(* )
. RAM |
||
2 GB DDR4( Soldered) | . | OS Storage | |
. | Internal Storage/ Bays | ||
4x 3.5″ SATA | . | I/O Ports | |
. |
. . |
Network Ports | |
. | . | . | |
. | . | . | |
170mm x 174mm x 230mm/ 2.2 kg | . | Rate | $ 175 |
$ 339 | . | ASUSTOR has actually transferred to the very same platform embraced by Synology for the DS223 and other 23-series individual/ home NAS designs, equaling the processing power used by the competitors. The intro of btrfs support in this lineup now brings simple pictures (and a little bit of ransomware security )to ASUSTOR’s clients at a budget-friendly rate point. | TerraMaster just recently |
.
.
.
TerraMaster 424 NAS Series
( Alder Lake-N)
.
.
F2-424 | |||
. | . | . | . |
. |
RAM . |
. 1x 32 GB DDR5-4800 SODIMM |
|
Internal Storage/ Bays | 2x 3.5″ SATA | . | |
. |
I/O Ports .(* )1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A) |
. . |
|
2x RJ-45( 2x 2.5 GbE ) |
. Power Adapter |
||
90W( External) | . | ||
222mm x 119mm x 154mm/ 2.2 kg | .(* ) . | . | |
$ 700 | .(* ) . | QNAP Ryzen 7000 Rackmounts, Broader TBS-h574TX NASBook Schedule and Application Updates | |
their very first consumer-focused hot-swappable all-flash NAS with M. 2/ E1.S SSD assistance. The TBS-h574TX reached retail in late 2023, and QNAP submitted a | detailing the use and functions of the system last month. After taking part in the launch webinar prior to that, my expectations were tempered a bit. In the year given that its teaser, the E1.S form-factor has actually not taken off as anticipated. Rather, we saw suppliers like Solidigm and Micron concentrate on the conventional 2.5″ form-factor with U. 2 and U. 3 SSDs. E1.L is making more sense for rackmount devices needing really high storage density, however the basic market pattern appears to be more towards U. 2/ U. 3 for both customer and SMB/ SME on-premise use. 2023 likewise saw the launch of 64TB-class U. 2/ U. 3 SSDs, and this form-factor appears extensively offered for purchase. | TBS-464 | Flashstor series |
, this Raptor Lake-based system is not especially inexpensive. Regardless of utilizing an ingrained part (Core i3-1340PE) which features in-band ECC assistance from Intel, QNAP does not have that made it possible for in the system (ideally it is something that can be attended to in a future upgrade). In general, this item looks like a missed out on chance for QNAP in the all-flash customer NAS market.
Proceeding to the current hardware intros, QNAP is focusing more on ZFS-enabled NAS systems now. The business just recently presented 2 rackmount systems based upon the Ryzen 7000 series, and their requirements are summed up in the table listed below.
.
.
. QNAP TS-h77AXU-RP Series( Ryzen 7000 Series)
.
.
. Design . TS-h1277AXU-RP-R5-16G .
TS-h1277AXU-RP-R7-32G
.
TS-h1677AXU-RP-R7-32G
.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | ||||
.( 8C/16T Zen 4 @ approximately 5.3 GHz/ AMD Radeon Graphics) | . | RAM( ECC UDIMMs Supported)(* ) . | . | |
. |
. 12x 3.5″ SATA |
. 16x 3.5″ SATA |
||
. | . | . | ||
. |
+ ) |
. . |
||
. Slot 3: Gen4 x4 | . | |||
550W x2 | .(* ) .[2x 2.5 GbE] Measurements and Weight[2x 10GBASE-T] .(* )( 2U) 88.65 mm x 432.05 mm x 511.3 mm/ 13 kg | |||
. | Rate . |
|||
$ 4699 | .(* ) . | |||
that utilizes a cloud-based engine beyond the conventional wise readouts. It utilizes a | and needs a license purchase for usage on more than one disk per NAS. QNAP is likewise promoting its SSD anti-wear leveling functions ( | ) as a distinguishing element of its QuTS ZFS running system. These kinds of value-additions might assist QuTS go head-to-head versus alternatives like TrueNAS. |